New Anglicanism

"Therefore every scribe who has been trained for the kingdom of heaven is like the master of a household who brings out of his treasure what is new and what is old" - Jesus (Gospel of Matthew 13:52)

0 notes &

I Believe: drilling down to the bedrock of faith

Personal Easter Reflections

 

I believe Jesus is who he said he was.

I believe the robust Jesus of the Gospels, not the pale, ephemeral Jesus of (some) scholars’ imaginations. 

I believe in the human excellence and divine wonder of Jesus – the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.

I believe in the mission of Christ, his place at the epicentre of God’s purposes, his great ‘yes’ to all the promises and plans of God.

I believe—while not comprehending—that in the cross we see a depth of love and sacrifice bringing the shalom of God, surpassing all human understanding: at once personal and cosmic.

I believe despite questions—deep questions—despite experience of much that life brings; of thoughts in ignorance and lack of imagination; of distractions, idols and my fallen-ness. 

I believe despite my unbelief.

I believe in the promises of Christ, his call to trust and commit, to follow, obey and serve.

I believe in the mutual indwelling of God, the sharing of one mind, love, trust and purpose that binds Abba Father, Son and Spirit as one.

I believe in the resurrection of Jesus—that he died (terribly), and came alive—raised triumphant, glorious, whole, pulsating with life.

I believe this event—this real-time event—changed the axis of history: my whole future, my being, the future of humanity, of God’s people, of the Kingdom-reign of God, of all creation—changed profoundly, resolutely, wonderfully in this awesome event. 

In God’s grace my ‘I’ becomes ‘we’ –

‘we’ with my sisters and brothers in Christ

‘we’ with the saints throughout the ages

‘we’ with the angels in heaven in our praise and adoration

‘we’ with those who in God’s grace are woven into the fabric of my life

‘we’ with my Lord who is my brother and advocate

I believe—WE believe—in the incarnate, crucified and resurrected Son of God.

Praise God from whom all blessings flow!

 

TJH – 30/3/13

0 notes &

Jesus at the Table - Holy Week Reflections

Readings for reflection

 

Print version for downloading is available here

Last Supper… and a new beginning

Luke 22:14-30 

14 When the time came, Jesus and the apostles sat down together at the table.*15 Jesus said, “I have been very eager to eat this Passover meal with you before my suffering begins.16 For I tell you now that I won’t eat this meal again until its meaning is fulfilled in the Kingdom of God.”

  17 Then he took a cup of wine and gave thanks to God for it. Then he said, “Take this and share it among yourselves.18 For I will not drink wine again until the Kingdom of God has come.”

  19 He took some bread and gave thanks to God for it. Then he broke it in pieces and gave it to the disciples, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this to remember me.”

  20 After supper he took another cup of wine and said, “This cup is the new covenant between God and his people—an agreement confirmed with my blood, which is poured out as a sacrifice for you.

  21 “But here at this table, sitting among us as a friend, is the man who will betray me.22 For it has been determined that the Son of Man* must die. But what sorrow awaits the one who betrays him.”23 The disciples began to ask each other which of them would ever do such a thing.

  24 Then they began to argue among themselves about who would be the greatest among them.25 Jesus told them, “In this world the kings and great men lord it over their people, yet they are called ‘friends of the people.’26 But among you it will be different. Those who are the greatest among you should take the lowest rank, and the leader should be like a servant.27 Who is more important, the one who sits at the table or the one who serves? The one who sits at the table, of course. But not here! For I am among you as one who serves.

  28 “You have stayed with me in my time of trial.29 And just as my Father has granted me a Kingdom, I now grant you the right30 to eat and drink at my table in my Kingdom. And you will sit on thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.

Footnotes:

22:14 Or reclined together.

22:22 “Son of Man” is a title Jesus used for himself.

Reflections

Each of the Gospels highlights differing features of the Last Supper. Luke underscores a striking table-fellowship dimension, where the table is seen as no less than the fulness of the kingdom as promised by the prophets (for example Isaiah 25:6-9). What started as a Passover meal took on new and deeper significance with reference to Jesus’ coming crucifixion and glorification.

While the Last Supper was a ‘one-off’ event, all that it signified is picked up in the Lord’s Supper gospel traditions (1 Corinthians 11:23-26), especially as a symbol of the new covenant.

Reflect on all the accounts of Jesus dining with a great variety of people in the Gospel of Luke, culminating to this one meal in which Jesus himself is the host.

Consider how we might highlight this ‘table fellowship’ with our Lord Jesus himself as we participate in the Lord’s Supper—at his table that lies at the heart of the kingdom of God.

 

Luke 24:13-35 

13 That same day two of Jesus’ followers were walking to the village of Emmaus, seven miles* from Jerusalem.14 As they walked along they were talking about everything that had happened.15 As they talked and discussed these things, Jesus himself suddenly came and began walking with them.16 But God kept them from recognizing him.

  17 He asked them, “What are you discussing so intently as you walk along?”

  They stopped short, sadness written across their faces.18 Then one of them, Cleopas, replied, “You must be the only person in Jerusalem who hasn’t heard about all the things that have happened there the last few days.”

  19 “What things?” Jesus asked.

  “The things that happened to Jesus, the man from Nazareth,” they said. “He was a prophet who did powerful miracles, and he was a mighty teacher in the eyes of God and all the people.20 But our leading priests and other religious leaders handed him over to be condemned to death, and they crucified him.21 We had hoped he was the Messiah who had come to rescue Israel. This all happened three days ago.

  22 “Then some women from our group of his followers were at his tomb early this morning, and they came back with an amazing report.23 They said his body was missing, and they had seen angels who told them Jesus is alive!24 Some of our men ran out to see, and sure enough, his body was gone, just as the women had said.”

  25 Then Jesus said to them, “You foolish people! You find it so hard to believe all that the prophets wrote in the Scriptures.26 Wasn’t it clearly predicted that the Messiah would have to suffer all these things before entering his glory?”27 Then Jesus took them through the writings

  28 By this time they were nearing Emmaus and the end of their journey. Jesus acted as if he were going on,29 but they begged him, “Stay the night with us, since it is getting late.” So he went home with them.30 As they sat down to eat,* he took the bread and blessed it. Then he broke it and gave it to them.31 Suddenly, their eyes were opened, and they recognized him. And at that moment he disappeared!

  32 They said to each other, “Didn’t our hearts burn within us as he talked with us on the road and explained the Scriptures to us?”33 And within the hour they were on their way back to Jerusalem. There they found the eleven disciples and the others who had gathered with them,34 who said, “The Lord has really risen! He appeared to Peter.*”

35 Then the two from Emmaus told their story of how Jesus had appeared to them as they were walking along the road, and how they had recognized him as he was breaking the bread.

Footnotes:

24:13 Greek 60 stadia [11.1 kilometers].

24:30 Or As they reclined.

24:34 Greek Simon.

Given the special emphasis Luke has highlighted in describing time and again how Jesus encountered people around the meal table, it is not surprising that meals features twice in the concluding chapter. The final appearance to the disciples in Luke’s Gospel involved him eating with them—a piece of broiled fish to demonstrate his very real flesh and blood form. Dining with the risen Lord now includes the proclamation of his resurrection, God’s ongoing presence though the Spirit and promise for Christ to return.

However, especially distinctive in Luke is the story of two followers on the road to Emmaus, joined by Jesus as they walked, but unrecognised at this point. The decisive moment when they discovered the identity of their travelling companion was (of course!), ‘when he was at table with them…’, and more specifically when Jesus ‘took bread and blessed and broke it and gave it to them’ (verse 30).

Again, while such events were unique, it can also be said that the invitation to share bread at the Lord’s table, and to dine in his company is ongoing and draws together all those who follow Christ, past, present and future, from every corner of this world. We dine only at Christ’s invitation, regardless of our own accomplishments and entirely through the mercies of God and at his expense (the body and blood broken and given for us).

‘Jesus at the table’ in the gospel narratives becomes to us ‘Jesus at The Table’, with all that it conveys about bridging the ‘here and now’ with confidence and hope in all that is yet to be.

We have a place at the table. We are known by name, and assured that in Christ we have every right to be there. When we join Jesus at the table, we are joined by ‘angels and archangels and all the company of heaven’. We are joined by the tax collectors and sinners (for in our own ways this also truly describes us). We are joined by the woman who wept and anointed the feet of Jesus, and by the extra party guests summoned to the banquet, and Zacchaeus… We are in good company indeed.

0 notes &

Jesus at the Table - Study 5

Jesus chooses his own company 

 A print version for download is available here.

Lenten Study 5 

Luke 19:1-10                         

Prayer

Preliminary discussion

The story of Zacchaeus is one of the most popular, abeit slightly comic, episodes in the Gospels – do you recall any memorable performances or presentations dealing with Zacchaeus? (An online retelling is available here)

Tax or toll collecting was one of the most despised businesses in Roman occupied Palestine, seen as both collaboration with foreign occupiers, and very often corrupt and exploitative – discuss some possible equivalent occupations in today’s world.

Passage (to be read aloud as if narrated by Luke, preferably with prior preparation)

Luke 19

1 Jesus entered Jericho and made his way through the town.2 There was a man there named Zacchaeus. He was the chief tax collector in the region, and he had become very rich.3 He tried to get a look at Jesus, but he was too short to see over the crowd.4 So he ran ahead and climbed a sycamore-fig tree beside the road, for Jesus was going to pass that way.
  5 When Jesus came by, he looked up at Zacchaeus and called him by name. “Zacchaeus!” he said. “Quick, come down! I must be a guest in your home today.”
  6 Zacchaeus quickly climbed down and took Jesus to his house in great excitement and joy.7 But the people were displeased. “He has gone to be the guest of a notorious sinner,” they grumbled.
  8 Meanwhile, Zacchaeus stood before the Lord and said, “I will give half my wealth to the poor, Lord, and if I have cheated people on their taxes, I will give them back four times as much!”
  9 Jesus responded, “Salvation has come to this home today, for this man has shown himself to be a true son of Abraham.10 For the Son of Man* came to seek and save those who are lost.”


Footnotes:

19:10 “Son of Man” is a title Jesus used for himself.

 

Initial impressions

Did anything in this passage strike you that you hadn’t noticed before?

Might there be other ways to emphasise the way it is read?

What questions does it raise in your mind?

Are there any characters you find it hard to relate to or understand where they are coming from? (If you were asked to act out their role, what would you need to think through or explore to ‘get inside their skin’?)

Some background

[Guest contributor Sarah Harris has provided the background material in this section. Sarah has significant expertise in Lukan studies, and this passage in particular. She lectures in New Testament at Carey Baptist College in Auckland, NZ.]

To really understand the story of Zacchaeus it is important to understand the social-cultural dynamic between toll collectors and the Jewish people. Taxes were collected in two forms: direct taxes such as a land and a head tax and indirect taxes such as tolls, customs and duties. The direct taxes were collected by the Jewish councils, while the indirect taxes were collected by local entrepreneurs such as Zacchaeus. These contractors collected a set amount for the state and then they added their own charge onto this amount. As we might imagine, this system was open to abuse. Although the senate tried to minimise abuse, the average poor person despised toll collectors who inevitably made themselves rich as they collected their ‘cut’. It is the old story of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer; the ancient world seems to have many similarities with today’s world!

Our Gospels show how the Jewish people despised toll collectors, and none more so than Zacchaeus who was a chief of the toll collectors. For the Jewish people he must have epitomized all that they hated about foreign rule which they viewed as ungodly and corrupt. In the story of Zacchaeus we see how the people form a barrier so the short rich man Zacchaeus cannot see Jesus when he enters Jericho (19:3), and they show their disapproval of Jesus staying at his house (19:7). ‘He has gone to be the guest of one who is a sinner!’ they cry out loud.

It is intriguing (while maybe not surprising) that Jesus sought out and saved such a man who was ostracized and undoubtedly lonely in his community. While he was economically ‘rich’ (19:2) and not ‘poor’ (4:18) as most others Jesus had encountered and saved, Zacchaeus was equally cut off from God and his fellow Jews and his spiritual and social poverty was very real. In true Lukan fashion, he encountered Jesus over hospitality in his home.

Reflections

In a number of crowd passages in the Gospels, we see a movement of those on the outer fringes (representing their social position) and otherwise ignored by the crowd, being drawn to the centre and experiencing a very personal encounter with Jesus. Jesus sees those that the crowd and especially religious leaders overlooked. Especially striking is the extent in which the most unlikely people (in social and religious terms) become some of the most ardent disciples.

The crowd was a barrier preventing Zacchaeus from viewing Jesus, and his short stature was obviously frequently commented upon and the object of mirth. Not only was he an unlikely subject for a spiritual transformation, he was a particularly unpopular one as well. In the eyes of the community, he simply didn’t deserve any grace or favour. Jesus’ call raises a number of questions about matters we are not told: how did Jesus know his name? etc. However, the terms we are in fact provided with are significant: ‘today’ reflects a moment of decision and a life-changing ‘here and now’ encounter. The way Jesus invited himself signals purpose: ‘It is necessary…’ for him to stay with Zacchaeus. As the narrative progresses, the welcome of Jesus by Zacchaeus makes a clear statement over his social acceptance by Christ—something that gives rise for further grumbling over the company Jesus keeps.

While there is no reference to Zacchaeus’ faith, his admission to cheating people (verse 8b) indicates that his encounter with Jesus was one of salvation (verse 10) and transformation. The accusation of his being a ‘notorious sinner’ (in the eyes of the community) is countered by the salvation provided by Jesus.

In contrast to the rich ruler in the preceding chapter (18:23), Zacchaeus’ response is generous and demonstrates a genuine change of heart (there are a number points of contrast between Zacchaeus and the rich ruler). Giving to the poor reflects a concern for those less fortunate and vulnerable, while the fourfold financial return of any loss incurred through his cheating or exploitation, highlights the importance of making restitution.  

For the purposes of our study series, the main feature of significance is that the arrival of salvation for Zacchaeus and his house (verse 9) came through the instrument of hospitality – Jesus choosing to remain as a guest in Zacchaeus’ home. Both literally and metaphorically, Zacchaeus opened his door to salvation in the person of Christ. We may be reminded of the words of Jesus recorded in Revelation 3:20 – ‘Here I am! I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in and eat with them, and they with me’ (TNIV).

Finally, we may note that these events occurred as Jesus drew ever closer to Jerusalem, and all the events that were to await him as he entered as king. Jesus went into conflict with various city authorities, culminating in the world-changing events of the first Easter.

Salvation came at a cost. As the lives of those who encountered Jesus on his journey to Jerusalem, such as Zacchaeus, were so profoundly changed, so too the burden of his work upon the cross grew all the more weighty. It was a cost measured in Jesus’ own blood (as we shall see in our reflections on the Last Supper).

Discussion points

The crowd was a barrier keeping Zacchaeus at a distance from Jesus – are there ways in which the church may be a barrier (culturally, institutionally, relationally) that comes between those who are seeking and Christ?

Zacchaeus was prominent for his leading role in a despised occupation – how might the church (in all its dimensions) bridge the gap and engage with those named in response to the preliminary discussion question above?

The Gospel of Luke highlights the home and table as at the very heart of mission and evangelism, and such relationships are marked by a coming alongside people and entering into their world and networks of family and friends. How might this be given expression in your own context(s)?

Zacchaeus had a profound experience of salvation available only through Jesus. Such salvation had personal, occupational and communal dimensions – what does this tell us about the gospel and salvation as reflected in this narrative, and similar episodes throughout Luke’s Gospel?

Salvation is personal, but never individual (in the sense that it inevitably and necessarily involves relationships to others). Do we over-emphasise the personal aspect and neglect communal dimensions to salvation?

Other resources

A fun YouTube sketch-graphic retelling of this episode is available here. A robust and incisive contemporary sermon based on this passage by Mark Driscoll is available here through the Mars Hill website.

Action points

Jesus had eyes to see those everyone else either overlooked or ridiculed – a very powerful action point is to open our eyes to those in our own community very often overlooked or held at a distance socially.

Most communities operate with a clear notion of group boundaries, including the church (including buildings and the need to walk through entrance points). Consider ways to soften the boundaries (physically, relationally, socially and culturally) that may be keeping people at a distance. This may include providing some anonymous ‘safe space’ at the edges, before judging the moment to invite people to draw closer.

Going deeper

This passage provides a number of contrasts with other episodes in Luke’s Gospel – such as the rich ruler (18:18-30), and also the parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector (18:9-14). Zacchaeus stands as an example of someone with wealth who did respond as urged by Jesus and thus entered the kingdom of heaven, including responding to the poor (compare 18:26-27). The muttering of the crowd (19:7) sounds much like the complaints concerning the company Jesus was keeping in Luke 15:1-2, echoed in the attitude of the older brother in the parable of the two sons (15: 28-30).

The classic text that details the list of despised occupations, including tax or toll collectors, remains J. Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus (ET SCM, 1969), pages 303-311.

The complaint made of Jesus should be understood in terms of accepting hospitality from someone whose wealth as been attained through corrupt or criminal means. Social ostracism was shaped in large measure for its deterrent qualities against criminal activities.

Verse 10 (which is similar to 5:32), recalls the language of Ezekiel 34, and the promise of a Davidic shepherd who would seek out and save the lost sheep of Israel—a motif that occurs elsewhere in Luke as well. Jesus’ designation of Zacchaeus as a ‘son of Abraham’ recognizes and affirms his place amongst the covenantal people of Israel.

0 notes &

Lenten Study 4 - Celebration in Heaven

Jesus at the table

‘Rejoice with me because I have found my lost sheep.’ In the same way, there is more joy in heaven over one lost sinner who repents and returns to God than over ninety-nine others who are righteous and haven’t strayed away!

‘Rejoice with me because I have found my lost coin.’ In the same way, there is joy in the presence of God’s angels when even one sinner repents.”

- Jesus (Luke 15: 6-7, 9-10)

Print version available here.

Luke 15: 1-2,11-32             Celebration in heaven

Prayer

Preliminary discussion

Share some of the memorable celebrations you have experienced. How was the specialness of the occasion reflected in the event?

Can you recall moments of joy at the return of someone special?

Can you recall times of reconciliation after a break in relationship, or when someone has had a change of heart and sought to make things right?

Can you recall times when you have witnessed someone coming to faith and discovering the joy of the gospel, especially by way of reconciliation with God? What areas of ‘turning’ might have been involved? Perhaps this is your own experience…

Passage (to be read aloud as if narrated by Luke, preferably with prior preparation)

Luke 15

1 Tax collectors and other notorious sinners often came to listen to Jesus teach.2 This made the Pharisees and teachers of religious law complain that he was associating with such sinful people—even eating with them!

11 To illustrate the point further, Jesus told them this story: “A man had two sons.12 The younger son told his father, ‘I want my share of your estate now before you die.’ So his father agreed to divide his wealth between his sons.
  13 ”A few days later this younger son packed all his belongings and moved to a distant land, and there he wasted all his money in wild living.14 About the time his money ran out, a great famine swept over the land, and he began to starve.15 He persuaded a local farmer to hire him, and the man sent him into his fields to feed the pigs.16 The young man became so hungry that even the pods he was feeding the pigs looked good to him. But no one gave him anything.
  17 ”When he finally came to his senses, he said to himself, ‘At home even the hired servants have food enough to spare, and here I am dying of hunger!18 I will go home to my father and say, “Father, I have sinned against both heaven and you,19 and I am no longer worthy of being called your son. Please take me on as a hired servant.”’
  20 ”So he returned home to his father. And while he was still a long way off, his father saw him coming. Filled with love and compassion, he ran to his son, embraced him, and kissed him.21 His son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against both heaven and you, and I am no longer worthy of being called your son.*’
  22 ”But his father said to the servants, ‘Quick! Bring the finest robe in the house and put it on him. Get a ring for his finger and sandals for his feet.23 And kill the calf we have been fattening. We must celebrate with a feast,24 for this son of mine was dead and has now returned to life. He was lost, but now he is found.’ So the party began.
  25 ”Meanwhile, the older son was in the fields working. When he returned home, he heard music and dancing in the house,26 and he asked one of the servants what was going on.27 ’Your brother is back,’ he was told, ‘and your father has killed the fattened calf. We are celebrating because of his safe return.’
  28 ”The older brother was angry and wouldn’t go in. His father came out and begged him,29 but he replied, ‘All these years I’ve slaved for you and never once refused to do a single thing you told me to. And in all that time you never gave me even one young goat for a feast with my friends.30 Yet when this son of yours comes back after squandering your money on prostitutes, you celebrate by killing the fattened calf!’
  31 ”His father said to him, ‘Look, dear son, you have always stayed by me, and everything I have is yours.32 We had to celebrate this happy day. For your brother was dead and has come back to life! He was lost, but now he is found!’”

Footnotes:

15:21 Some manuscripts add Please take me on as a hired servant.

 

Initial impressions

Did anything in this passage strike you that you hadn’t noticed before?

Might there be other ways to emphasise the way it is read?

What questions does it raise in your mind?

Are there any characters you find it hard to relate to or understand where they are coming from? (If you were asked to act out their role, what would you need to think through or explore to ‘get inside their skin’?)

Some background

As familiar as this passage may be (it is one of the most popular of Jesus’ parables), there are many layers of significance. It is especially important to note the context in 15: 1 & 2. Jesus is again responding to criticism of his consorting with tax collectors and ‘notorious sinners’. Indeed, it is said that Jesus was ‘even eating with them’ (v.2), and it is with this in view that we include it in our ‘Jesus at the Table’ series.

The three parables which complement each other in Luke 15 all concern the theme of ‘lostness’, but equally important, of the heavenly joy and celebration when what (or who) was previously lost is found and brought home. The ‘lost’ are clearly identified with the ‘tax collectors and notorious sinners’.

More to the point, the response of Jesus to such criticism in the form of these parables is more than to simply shrug it off: he replies with pointed criticism of the religious leaders for their failure to join him in such celebrations, for when he eats with ‘notorious sinners’ responding to his message, they are in heavenly company as the angels rejoice as well (verses 6-7, 9-10).

This is a parable about two sons. As much as we may identify with the spiritual experience of the younger son, the focus of the parable is as much over the attitude and relational ‘lostness’ of the older son. This is especially true when we recognise that Jesus addresses the parable directly to the Pharisees and teachers of the law, for much of the attitude and resentment of the older brother is reflected in their complaint to Jesus.

Jesus is pleading not so much with immoral outsiders as with moral insiders. He wants to show them their blindness, narrowness, and self-righteousness, and how these things are destroying both their own souls and the lives of the people around them. (Timothy Keller, The Prodigal God, p.10)

Many features of the younger son’s experience have been well described elsewhere (see standard commentaries). Of special note for our interests are the ‘honour and shame’ dimensions, with the demand for an early inheritance being a ‘slap in the face’ for the father, bringing public shame upon the family as a whole.

The experience of the younger son strikes a real chord of identification with people of every age. The recognition that his sin was not only against his father, but just as much ‘against heaven’ makes a profound statement. Verse 20 is one of the greatest pictures of the gospel message. Conventions of honour in the ancient world would have expected the previously shamed father to stand tall and let the pleading son know of his shame.

It was a sign of dignity that a wealthy man never ran (they had servants to do that), and indeed made it clear than lesser people came to them, and especially when approaching with a request. Each phrase in verse 20 is powerful: the father was ‘moved with love and compassion’ (the idea that you might allow other people to disturb your own emotions and evoke compassion was frowned upon and feared), the father ran (!!) towards the son—in full view of the village! The ‘embrace’ is more literally a complete ‘falling upon the neck’ of the son, accompanied by the kiss of recognition and welcome. This is starkly counter-cultural, and the audience would be stunned, and perhaps even shocked.

All this makes a profound statement about the character and grace of God. The extravagance on display in the celebratory banquet lies at the heart of the parable, bridging the interaction between the father and both sons. For one it is a sign of being ‘home’ that brings delight to the father’s heart; for the other it is witness to the distancing of the older brother from a profound family event, and the grief this causes the father.

Including this parable in the ‘Jesus at the Table’ series is more than a passing connection. The final point of the parable revisits the initial point of disagreement between Jesus and the scribes and Pharisees: the fact he was eating with ‘notorious sinners’. The failure of the older son to join the celebratory banquet meant that he missed out on a family and household event, and this in itself dishonoured the father. When applied to the ministry of Jesus in identifying with similar ‘prodigals’, this refusal to join the celebrations (as Jesus dined with ‘sinners’) meant the religious leaders were excluding themselves from a profound heavenly celebration that was at the heart of Jesus’ mission and ministry.

More positively, the details of the celebration are emphatic and notably extravagant: the finest robe, ring for his finger, sandals and fattened calf all highlight the grace of God at its most abundant, and undoubtedly undeserved.

In the wider context of Luke’s Gospel, the ability of Jesus to enter the social worlds of ‘notorious sinners’ and bring about transformation and changes of heart and lifestyle, stand in stark contrast to the Pharisees and teachers of the law who kept a distance out of fear of unholy association and potential spiritual contamination.

We must celebrate with a feast, for this son of mine was dead and has now returned to life. He was lost, but now he is found.’ So the party began.

Discussion points

This passage is popularly known as the ‘prodigal son’, but given it is about two sons, is this an adequate title? What other title might you give it?

What might modern equivalents to the younger ‘prodigal’ son look like? How might we imagine a contemporary version of the same parable?

Similarly, in looking at our own contexts, what might the counterparts to the older brother look like? Can we identify with such attitudes? Might it be that in our churches we are very supportive of outreach and mission in our own contexts—until people who come to faith and join the church ask for change or criticise the way things are done. Perhaps we are critical of the amount of time and attention these ‘newcomers’ receive from our pastors and leaders? It can take a while before we accept ‘newcomers’ as bona fide members of our church communities.

The word ‘prodigal’ means someone who ‘who spends money in a recklessly extravagant way’. Timothy Keller (see below) argues that this comes to describe the work of God as reflected in the ministry of Jesus. The actions of Jesus in sharing a table with repentant sinners responding to his message and ministry is criticised as improper and shameful. The older son regards such celebrations as an unmerited extravagance, yet this very celebration, and all it conveys in terms of return, reconciliation and ‘resurrection’, gets to the heart of gospel ministry.

Other resources

A picture of the powerful Charlie Mackesy sculpture ‘The Return of the Prodigal Son’ is available here. Many other examples are available online, including one by Auguste Rodin – do a google search. To what extent do they effectively evoke aspects of the parable? An especially striking comparison can be found in ‘The Parable of the Prodigal Son’ – a story told in sculpture by Margaret Adams Parker (commissioned and installed at Duke Divinity School), available here (click through the series - highly recommended!).

Many other books, sermons and videos are available online. Two in particular are recommended:

Timothy Keller – see about his book ‘The Prodigal God’ hereA related and very evocative (promo) video is available here.

Also of interest:

Graham Tomlin applies the ‘prodigal’ characteristic to the Spirit in his book The Prodigal Spirit: The Trinity, the Church and the Future of the World (Alpha International, 2011) – inspired by Charlie Mackesy’s sculpture.

A summary and snippets may be found on Tomlin’s blog

Action points

Are we motivated by the ‘lost and found’ motif in these parables, troubled by those who are lost, and joyous over anyone who comes to faith and is reconciled with God?

How well do we celebrate as church communities? Are our gatherings marked by joy and delight in the saving work of God? What might such a celebration look like this Easter, as we rejoice over the greater One who was dead, and now is alive? Do we enter into the joy of heaven in our praise and worship?

Going deeper

The writings of Kenneth E. Bailey, especially Poet & Peasant and Through Peasant Eyes: A Literary-Cultural Approach to the Parables in Luke (Eerdmans, 1983) is a classic text on this passage.

[A helpful YouTube clip is available of Bailey with the title ‘The Rev. Dr. Kenneth E. Bailey: Jesus, the Oppressed, and the Oppressors’, with reference to passages in Luke 18 & 19 – this would be helpful preparation for our study next week]

N.T. Wright (and others) has explored reading the parable with reference to Israel’s yet-to-be-realised return from exile: see his Jesus and the Victory of God (esp. pages 126-127), where the return from exile and ultimate resurrection from the dead happens in and through Jesus. 

0 notes &

Lenten Study 3 - Dinner party stories

Jesus at the table

“…when you give a feast, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you. For you will be repaid at the resurrection of the just.” —Jesus   (Luke 14:13-14)

 

Lenten Study 3              Dinner party stories

A print version is available for download here

For study purposes, a scan of pages 46-54 of Douglas Webster, Table Grace: The Role of Hospitality in the Christian Life (Christian Focus, 2011) is available here. The book is highly recommended - you can order it here or here.

Luke 14:1,7-11, 12-24                       

Prayer

Preliminary discussion

Share some classic dinner party scenes from movies or books that stand out in your memory. What social dynamics are reflected? What role does the dinner scene play in the wider narrative of the book or movie?

[Some possibilities: ‘Guess who’s coming to dinner?’; ‘Babette’s Feast’; ‘Under the Tuscan Sun’ – clips are available on You Tube – for those who know the wider plot involving migrant workers working on the house restoration, see especially the brief You Tube clip ‘Under the tuscan sun – “Oda a San Lorenzo” scene’]

Passage (to be read aloud as if narrated by Luke, preferably with prior preparation)

Luke 14

1 One Sabbath day Jesus went to eat dinner in the home of a leader of the Pharisees, and the people were watching him closely…

7 When Jesus noticed that all who had come to the dinner were trying to sit in the seats of honor near the head of the table, he gave them this advice:8 ”When you are invited to a wedding feast, don’t sit in the seat of honour. What if someone who is more distinguished than you has also been invited?9 The host will come and say, ‘Give this person your seat.’ Then you will be embarrassed, and you will have to take whatever seat is left at the foot of the table!
  10 ”Instead, take the lowest place at the foot of the table. Then when your host sees you, he will come and say, ‘Friend, we have a better place for you!’ Then you will be honoured in front of all the other guests.11 For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.”

12 Then he turned to his host. “When you put on a luncheon or a banquet,” he said, “don’t invite your friends, brothers, relatives, and rich neighbors. For they will invite you back, and that will be your only reward.13 Instead, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the blind.14 Then at the resurrection of the righteous, God will reward you for inviting those who could not repay you.”



15 Hearing this, a man sitting at the table with Jesus exclaimed, “What a blessing it will be to attend a banquet* in the Kingdom of God!”
  16 Jesus replied with this story: “A man prepared a great feast and sent out many invitations.17 When the banquet was ready, he sent his servant to tell the guests, ‘Come, the banquet is ready.’18 But they all began making excuses. One said, ‘I have just bought a field and must inspect it. Please excuse me.’19 Another said, ‘I have just bought five pairs of oxen, and I want to try them out. Please excuse me.’20 Another said, ‘I now have a wife, so I can’t come.’
  21 ”The servant returned and told his master what they had said. His master was furious and said, ‘Go quickly into the streets and alleys of the town and invite the poor, the crippled, the blind, and the lame.’22 After the servant had done this, he reported, ‘There is still room for more.’23 So his master said, ‘Go out into the country lanes and behind the hedges and urge anyone you find to come, so that the house will be full.24 For none of those I first invited will get even the smallest taste of my banquet.’”


Footnotes:

14:15 Greek to eat bread

Initial impressions

Did anything in this passage strike you that you hadn’t noticed before?

Might there be other ways to emphasise the way it is read?

What questions does it raise in your mind?

Are there any characters you find it hard to relate to or understand where they are coming from? (If you were asked to act out their role, what would you need to think through or explore to ‘get inside their skin’?)

Some background

The first verse sets the scene in terms of our interest in ‘Jesus at the Table’. These passages record advice from Jesus regarding a godly way to approach the ‘status game’ that was so prominent around invitations and places of honour at the table, followed by a parable set in the same context. Both passages are to be read alongside the other.  Jesus is at a table, speaking to those present about the social world drawn around tables.

The location of guests around the tables was a clearly understood statement about social hierarchy and just how close guests were to the host.

image

[Pedar W. Foss, “Kitchens and Dining Rooms at Pompeii: the spatial and social relationship of cooking to eating in the Roman household, Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, 1994, 45-56. Web Document. 1995, Pedar W. Foss]

Jesus is doing significantly more than providing tips on how to strategise to gain social advancement (not that this is the goal in any event): he is subverting the whole system. Given that the layout of a dinner party and related seating (reclining) positions functioned to mirror a wider social world constructed and maintained to reinforce the positions of the elite, Jesus’ teaching at this point is nothing less than a challenge to disregard the social order and hierarchy of his day, and replace it with a kingdom community shaped by a very different set of values of social and human worth. This is Jesus shaking up the social foundations in a markedly counter-cultural way (note verse 11).

It is to be remembered the extent to which Jesus embodied this profound statement (v.11). His own humble origins and manner of life foreshadowed the chosen path that led to his death as the epitome of weakness and humiliation (according to the value system of the Graeco-Roman world). His was the death of a slave, and a shamed and despised one at that. Yet through this God’s ‘reversal’ was at work, demonstrating real power and a depth of love and sacrifice that revealed the glory of God and exalted Christ (Philippians 2:5-11).

If the first passage (14:7-11) addresses questions of honour and status reflected at the meal table, the following passage (14:12-24) highlights and challenges the social dynamics reflected in the guest list, and conventions of invitation and reply more generally.

It helps to understand the protocols of invitation and response when setting this parable in context. The offering of an invitation was making a significant social statement: the guest was thereby recognised as a social equal and ‘friend’, who would thereby be expected to reciprocate in due course. Invitations were not issued to anyone with whom the host would not want to associate, or to be under any obligation to accept a return invitation—it was an effective way of maintaining the social dominance of the controlling elite.

Accepting an invitation was also a peer group exercise. A delay in responding indicates someone who has doubts about the standing of the hosts, and other likely guests. Invitees would be keen to know whom else had been invited—and whether or not they had accepted…

This illuminates the power of this parable. Not only was the host being shamed by the thinly disguised excuses that were clear social snubs, it also highlights why those from the streets and further afield needed to be compelled to attend – they knew they could not reciprocate the hospitality and that (following social conventions) they ought to decline themselves.

Again we see a profoundly counter-cultural and subversive statement being made by Jesus. He does more than show concern for the poor and socially outcast, he completely redraws the contours and value system that shaped the dominant social world of his day. The kingdom of God demolishes the barriers and divides that otherwise excludes those not part of the inner circles.

This parable is essentially all about the people of the kingdom, and the invitation to enter and receive the kingdom that knows no boundaries or exclusive A-lists. It reflects nothing less than an invitation to all who hear to accept the same invitation still before us today.

Discussion points

In what ways do we ‘play the status game’ in our own contexts? Is it reflected in recognisable places or spaces of ‘honour’? (think in terms of homes, neighbourhoods, places of work, community space, one suburb or town over against others, ceremonies or rituals…)

We all know the fascination with (so-called) ‘A-list’ and ‘B-list’ celebrity events, and similarly more formal social occasions where strong etiquettes of place and honour are reflected. Do we have our own versions of this in our own social contexts? Can they be found in our church communities and practices as well? How might we reflect gospel values in these various contexts?

It is not that Jesus turns the values that shape social worlds upside down – it is more that he turns them right-side up (v.11). How might we give expression to this personally, and as church communities?

Other resources

There is much of value in Douglas Webster’s book Table Grace: The Role of Hospitality in the Christian Life (Christian Focus, 2011). A scanned copy of pages 46-54 is also available here.

More detail on the social implications of seating arrangements and other hospitality conventions reflecting honour and status is available at:

http://sydney.edu.au/arts/classics_ancient_history/dropbox/hgender.html

Action points

Jesus worked within the established social modes and ‘rules’ of his day to make a striking statement about the kingdom of God. There are powerful stories from times of the abolition of the slave trade, through to the challenging of apartheid in South Africa and bridging some of the endless ethnic divides of our own times. Explore possible examples and opportunities in your own contexts to adopt this example.

One very real example in our own communities that might be addressed concerns ministry to, by and through people with disabilities.

Going deeper

Discussions of honour and shame in the world of Jesus and the New Testament are very extensive, but highly rewarding in understanding the social and cultural context addressed in the life, example and teaching of Jesus, and no more so than in his death and resurrection.

For further consideration regarding honour and shame dynamics  in various parts of our world today, together with practical resources and suggestions for further reading, see:

http://wernermischke.org/resources/

0 notes &

the-hermit-retreat asked: Hi I cant locate your response to my questions on your blog.

I have given an answer, in as much as I can within this format.

0 notes &

the-hermit-retreat asked: Why do so many people who claim to be Christians refuse to accept transsexual and intersex people in their schools as either staff or employees when they are receiving government funding? Why are so many churches opposed to the Anti Discrimination and Human RIghts Bill that Federal Labor Has Proposed? WHere are these people supposed to go when it comes to aged care if church run aged care services will not accept them or expect them to hide their true being?

Greetings hermit-retreat. You have asked some wide-ranging questions which cannot be easily answered in a few sentences or paragraphs. I will do my best to sketch the line of thinking that shapes the church’s approach, but please recognise that much more should be said.

In general terms, a tolerant democratic society will seek to balance the rights of a range of individuals (and in themselves often reflecting a range of beliefs and world views), with the rights of other individuals and faith communities to live by their own values and beliefs. While we seek justice and positive values as a society, we stop short of mandating any one particular belief system (whether religious or philosophical). With regard to the church, we believe our beliefs and values need to be consistent with the faith traditions we have received, and grounded in our understanding of Scripture.

More specifically, schools are different to care agencies which are different to churches. I cannot answer for schools and care agencies, except to say they generally distinguish between those in leadership roles, who are expected to model and exemplify our values, and those who may be recipients of a service (whether education or care). My understanding is that ministry is offered to a wide range of people, including those you list. 

When it comes to those in ministry under the auspices of the church, a ‘higher bar’ is expected. Note however, that this is less about who people are, but how their identity is expressed, especially in terms of lifestyle. In the Anglican Church of Australia, those in leadership are required to affirm and adhere to ‘Faithfulness in Service’ (as reflecting our beliefs and understanding of Scripture). However, this does not stop ministry among and to all manner of people - as frequently is the case.

With regard to government funding, the question becomes to what extent the government of the day should specify and enforce belief-systems and associated values on minority groups. It can be pointed out that Christians are taxpayers too and should be eligible for funding provisions as much as any other community group.

0 notes &

Jesus at the Table - Study 2: Simon the Pharisee and the woman of the streets

Jesus at the table

 A print version of this study may be downloaded here

 

Lenten Study 2                       

Luke 7:36-50                          Simon the Pharisee & the woman of the streets

Prayer

Preliminary discussion

Have you ever felt uncomfortable about the company you have experienced at a dinner party or other social occasion?

Have there been occasions when someone off the street has wandered into church – and if so, what can you recall about the occasion?

Names and labels are a powerful social dynamic (both positively and negatively) – what are some of the more significant positive social labels in your own community? What about negative labels?

Do we slip into ‘spiritualised’ versions of labels in our own churches?

Passage – part 1 (to be read aloud in two parts)

(New Living Translation)

Luke 7

36 One of the Pharisees asked Jesus to have dinner with him, so Jesus went to his home and sat down to eat.*37 When a certain immoral woman from that city heard he was eating there, she brought a beautiful alabaster jar filled with expensive perfume.38 Then she knelt behind him at his feet, weeping. Her tears fell on his feet, and she wiped them off with her hair. Then she kept kissing his feet and putting perfume on them.
  39 When the Pharisee who had invited him saw this, he said to himself, “If this man were a prophet, he would know what kind of woman is touching him. She’s a sinner!”
  

 

Footnotes

7:36 Or and reclined.

7:41 Greek 500 denarii. A denarius was equivalent to a labourer’s full day’s wage.

 

 

 

Initial impressions

Did anything in this passage strike you that you hadn’t noticed before?

Might there be other ways to emphasise the way it is read?

What questions does it raise in your mind?

Are there any characters you find it either hard to relate to or understand where they are coming from? (If you were asked to act out their role, what would you need to think through or explore to ‘get inside their skin’?)

Some background

This is a particularly well-crafted narrative from Luke. The context is a Jewish form of the Graeco-Roman dinner party in the home of a Pharisee, starting with a meal, before progressing to the after-dinner drinks (‘symposium’) where the guest of honour is invited to lead a discussion with other invited guests. At this stage, many Greek and Roman well-to-do dinner parties would turn to entertainment, drinking and ‘female companions’ (usually attractive, wealthy and well-educated prostitutes). Anyone seeking to conduct a ‘respectable’ dinner party would go out of their way to make it clear that no such entertainment would be offered, and that the focus would be on serious philosophical or similar discussion.

The passage starts quite starkly, without names or background. Jesus is invited to a dinner party; he enters the house and ‘reclines’ (on his left elbow, head facing inwards and feet facing the wall). We are then introduced to a key figure who remains un-named: a ‘woman of the city’ and ‘sinner’. If we were to paraphrase ‘street-walker’, we would not be too far off the mark. However, the woman may well have had some wealth and been accustomed to being invited to other dinner parties as a companion. The point to note carefully is that woman at this stage is little more than a label: she enters with considerable social and irreligious baggage (compare the end of verse 39). She is the wrong person, in the wrong place, at the wrong time.

This early stage of the narrative has a growing character of incredulity to it. The story moves from being normal to curious to increasingly socially bizarre. Below the surface, verses 37 and 38 contain a series of statements all introduced by ‘and…, and…, and…, and…’, akin to someone retelling an event over a fence with an increasingly incredulous “and you won’t believe this” quality.

And behold a woman, who was a sinner

and when she learned…

and she stood behind him at his feet, weeping

and began to bathe his feet with her tears

and to dry them with her hair

and she continued kissing his feet

and anointing them with ointment

[try re-reading this, with an increasing emphasis on each ‘and’]

As we hear this, it is important to sense and understand the social unease and potential scandal in all this. The actions of a woman with a notorious immoral reputation (most likely sexual) would be akin (in our context) to a woman known to be an escort coming into one of our dinner parties, removing a wrap to reveal provocative clothing and thus expose herself (for this is how unfurled hair was perceived). Using an expensive jar of perfume that was otherwise kept as one of her ‘tools of the trade’, she proceeds to kiss and fondle the feet of a high profile guest. It would have every appearance of being a sexual ‘come-on’. We could well understand someone saying “Jesus, this doesn’t look good!”

It is from this perspective that we need to sympathise with the concerns of the Pharisee in whose home such compromising conduct is occurring—and before his other guests and friends. His conclusion (verse 39) is that Jesus (at the very least) shows an alarming lack of judgement.

Discussion points (1)

Imagine you are the host of such a dinner party, and the scenario noted above unfolds – how would you feel and react?

Continue with your imagination – what would you think if the special guest was a highly regarded conference speaker?

How would you feel and respond if you were the special guest, even if you knew the woman?

Passage – part 2

40 Then Jesus answered his thoughts. “Simon,” he said to the Pharisee, “I have something to say to you.”
  ”Go ahead, Teacher,” Simon replied.
  

41 Then Jesus told him this story: “A man loaned money to two people—500 pieces of silver* to one and 50 pieces to the other.42 But neither of them could repay him, so he kindly forgave them both, canceling their debts. Who do you suppose loved him more after that?”
  43 Simon answered, “I suppose the one for whom he canceled the larger debt.”
  ”That’s right,” Jesus said.

44 Then he turned to the woman and said to Simon, “Look at this woman kneeling here. When I entered your home, you didn’t offer me water to wash the dust from my feet, but she has washed them with her tears and wiped them with her hair.45 You didn’t greet me with a kiss, but from the time I first came in, she has not stopped kissing my feet.46 You neglected the courtesy of olive oil to anoint my head, but she has anointed my feet with rare perfume.
  47 ”I tell you, her sins—and they are many—have been forgiven, so she has shown me much love. But a person who is forgiven little shows only little love.”48 Then Jesus said to the woman, “Your sins are forgiven.”
  49 The men at the table said among themselves, “Who is this man, that he goes around forgiving sins?”
  50 And Jesus said to the woman, “Your faith has saved you; go in peace.

Further background notes

The dinner party host is now named for the first time named: Simon. Jesus tells one of his shortest parables (verses 41-42), and the point is clear.

We are not told the woman’s name, and in this instance it implies that the details of her life and any prior encounter with Jesus are private. We don’t need to know: it’s not our business any more than it is Simon’s. Nor do we know the reason for her tears: they could be tears of remorse and grief over her sin, or deep pain poured out, or perhaps even newfound devotion from a very deep place.

In the second half of the narrative Jesus in essence retells the episode, but the version Jesus sees is very different. The details are subtle but striking: looking directly at the woman, Jesus speaks to Simon (44). “Do you see this woman?” – with the implication that he did not see her truly, or at least as Jesus saw her.

In this deeper retelling, Simon stands condemned as the one who had wronged Jesus. Contrary to the expectations of genuine hospitality, Jesus had not had his feet cleaned upon arrival, nor greeted with a kiss, nor had his head anointed with oil. In Jesus’ eyes, the woman’s actions made up for the failings of Simon as a host: not water but tears; no towel but hair; no kiss of greeting but kissing of feet; no anointing but ointment; not upon the head, but onto unseemly and dirty feet.

Inasmuch as we are let into Jesus’ private dealings with the woman, we learn (verse 47) that her sins ‘though many’ are forgiven, and in this it becomes clear that the woman’s actions are those of gratitude and devotion. Whatever prior experience she had of Jesus, the next words addressed to the woman are as much for the onlookers as for her: “your sins are forgiven”.

While this statement has profound personal significance, it goes wider than that. She is freed of the baggage of a widely known reputation as a fallen woman, together with the label ‘sinner’ that accompanied her wherever she went.

We are not told of Simon’s response, nor of the final reaction by the other guests. In the end, they don’t matter. What we are pointed to is subtle but powerful. Speaking again to the woman, she is assured “Your faith has saved you” followed with a farewell greeting extended within the family of faith “go in peace”. With these words she is restored to God’s covenantal community, and may step out with the assurance that she is a daughter of Israel.

Discussion points (2)

The point of the mini-parable is clear, but do we overlook the deeper challenge? Can we identify with such gratitude ourselves? Do we take delight when other people with well-recognised shortcomings are forgiven?

Who do you identify with in this parable? Why?

While we may (rightly) seek to avoid placing labels on people, do we nonetheless judge by superficial appearances and subconsciously relegate people to ‘most unlikely to be saved’ categories?

The approach of the Pharisees was to separate themselves off from those with ‘lifestyle issues’ and lives of sinfulness. Jesus caused scandal by his association with and social acceptance of those whose notorious sinfulness was otherwise cause to be held at a distance – he brought change and transformation out of close relationships, love and acceptance. If Jesus was in our community, who would he be engaging and socially associating with?

Other resources

To understand more of the role and social standing of ‘female companions’ at dinner parties, see ‘Hetaira’ at:  http://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/greece/hetairai/hetairai.html

A version of this episode based on the Contemporary English Version can be found on YouTube: ‘Simon the Pharisee Luke 7:36-50.mp4’

Action points

Consider the implications of this passage at multiple levels:

At a personal level, do we recognise and value the need for forgiveness and assurance of peace with God?

Do we take care with our language and the ways we speak of others?

What could be done to bridge the cultural and social gaps between our church communities and those regarded as immoral or ‘fallen’ in our wider society?

Going deeper

The early church was accused of having a disproportionate number of women, and for conduct that was considered scandalous and potentially undermining authority. Missional ministry seeks to accommodate cultural diversity as much as possible, while also challenging and subverting many of the values that uphold existing social order and hierarchies. Much of this was on display when Christian communities gathered, and especially as women frequently found freedoms not in evidence elsewhere in society.

Further study of these tensions can be explored in Kathleen E. Corley, Private Women, Public Meals: Social Conflict in the Synoptic Tradition. Hendricksen, 1993. A discussion of this passage is found on pages 121-130.

There are connections between this passage and the units immediately before and after. After considering the racially marginalised (7:1-10), and also the economically vulnerable (7:11-17), Luke has focused on the spiritual receptiveness of the crowds over against the Pharisees. ‘All the people who heard this, including the tax collectors, acknowledged the justice of God, because they had been baptised with John’s baptism. But by refusing to be baptised by him, the Pharisees and the lawyers rejected God’s purpose for themselves’ (7:29-30). The contrast between Simon and the woman illustrates this difference in response.

Immediately following this episode there are verses unique to Luke’s Gospel, noting a number of women whose lives were transformed by encountering Jesus, and were subsequently not only followers but also provided for Jesus and the other disciples.

0 notes &

Jesus at the Table - Study 1 Levi’s great feast

[Note - this is a CORRECTED version]  A print version is available here.

Comments, suggestions and feedback welcome below.

                                               Jesus at the table  

                                                LENTEN STUDY 1

 

Luke 5:27-39                                     

 

Preliminary discussion

Share any memories of a special meal where the company really made the event.

Describe what your ideal dinner party would be like – and why.

 

Passage (to be read aloud as if narrated by Luke, preferably with prior preparation)

(New Living Translation)

Luke 5

27 Later, as Jesus left the town, he saw a tax collector named Levi sitting at his tax collector’s booth. “Follow me and be my disciple,” Jesus said to him. 28 So Levi got up, left everything, and followed him.  29 Later, Levi held a banquet in his home with Jesus as the guest of honor. Many of Levi’s fellow tax collectors and other guests also ate with them.30 But the Pharisees and their teachers of religious law complained bitterly to Jesus’ disciples, “Why do you eat and drink with such scum?*”
  31 Jesus answered them, “Healthy people don’t need a doctor—sick people do. 32 I have come to call not those who think they are righteous, but those who know they are sinners and need to repent.”



33 One day some people said to Jesus, “John the Baptist’s disciples fast and pray regularly, and so do the disciples of the Pharisees. Why are your disciples always eating and drinking?”
  34 Jesus responded, “Do wedding guests fast while celebrating with the groom? Of course not. 35 But someday the groom will be taken away from them, and then they will fast.”
  36 Then Jesus gave them this illustration: “No one tears a piece of cloth from a new garment and uses it to patch an old garment. For then the new garment would be ruined, and the new patch wouldn’t even match the old garment.
  37 ”And no one puts new wine into old wineskins. For the new wine would burst the wineskins, spilling the wine and ruining the skins.38 New wine must be stored in new wineskins.39 But no one who drinks the old wine seems to want the new wine. ‘The old is just fine,’ they say.”

Footnotes:

5:30 Greek with tax collectors and sinners?


Initial impressions

Did anything strike you that you hadn’t noticed before?

Might there be other ways to emphasise the way it is read?

What questions does it raise in your mind?

Are there any characters you find it hard to relate to or understand where they are coming from? (If you were asked to act out their role, what would you need to think through or explore to ‘get inside their skin’?)

Some background

This is the first meal scene in the Gospel of Luke, and it introduces a number of features that recur in subsequent passages, and especially controversy over Jesus’ association with tax collectors. This passage has a number of similarities with the encounter with Zacchaeus in Luke 19:1-10, and we will explore the great suspicion and disdain for tax collectors and their notorious reputation for corruption and exploitation in study five.

Luke has already noted that tax collectors were among those who responded to John the Baptist’s call for repentance and baptism (3:3), and the call to Levi to “follow me” (5:27-28) parallels the response of the first disciples who ‘left everything and followed him’ (5:11). As the public ministry of Jesus gained momentum, a large number of Levi’s friends and associates were included in the guest list and attended the banquet (5:29), giving rise to the Pharisees ‘complaining bitterly’ to other disciples about their inclusion as guests.

We need to work hard at understanding the perspectives and concerns of the Pharisees (all too easily dismissed as ungracious legalists). Pharisees (rightly) viewed things in community terms. The righteous judgement of God comes upon communities as much as individuals. One of the great lessons learned from the experience of exile into Babylon in the Old Testament is that this was an act of judgement upon God’s covenant people, because they had stopped reading God’s Word and turned a blind eye to disobedience and sin within their own communities.

Coming out of this experience of exile was a determination that this must never happen again, and that the community as a whole (and especially leaders) must read and live out God’s Torah instructions faithfully, for communities stand or fall on the basis of their joint commitment to live out their faith and obedience. The presence of those who flagrantly disobeyed God’s instructions endangered the spiritual health of the community as a whole. The Pharisees emerged in the mid-second century before Christ with this line of thinking much in mind, with a concern to see the covenant people separate themselves off from unfaithfulness and disobedience to God’s Torah.

The way in which table fellowship was conducted was regarded as the clearest mirror of the community’s spiritual faithfulness. Re-read verses 29-30 with this background in mind, and perhaps think of similar contexts in our own neighbourhoods where we might be concerned over flagrant lawlessness and conduct. If it helps to bring an honesty to our own concerns, think about parties where we would be concerned if our own family members were in attendance…

The first section of this passage focuses on the guests included in the banquet. The second part highlights the nature of the banquet. Eating and drinking is contrasted with fasting and praying (v.33). It poses a contrast between perceptions of spiritual discipline and asceticism, over against partying and celebration marked by some abundance (a ‘great feast’, verse 29). When many of the poor where abused and suffered under corrupt and exploitative tax collectors, criticism of Jesus and his disciples participating in such an event may have some legitimacy. A wedding feast was held over seven days during which time fasting was not permitted, and Jesus uses this to argue that this was not a time to fast, but that such times will come once the ‘bridegroom’ has departed (ie. Jesus).

The final contrast developed by Jesus is between old and new eras. This is expressed through two images: old and new garments (the former already shrunk), and new wine in old wineskins (the latter already stretched to capacity). Old and new cannot combine without tension, and the ministry of Jesus is cast very much as the new.

Verse 39 is curious. Most read it as indicating that many will favour the old ways because they are more familiar, but will miss out on the new as a result. It is possible, however, to read it as indicating that the ministry of Jesus is the mature wine that is in continuity with ancient covenantal roots.

Discussion points

1. It is easy to dismiss the complaints of the Pharisees as reflecting unloving legalists. Are there any parts of us that can identify with something of their concerns?

2. Jesus response is not indifference to spiritual health and right behaviour: sick people need a doctor and see change in their lives (verses 31-32). The difference between the Pharisees and Jesus is not over the need for repentance, but the nature of community. The Pharisees insisted on repentance before acceptance into the community; Jesus enjoyed and mixed freely with people so that they might repent and see their lives changed – the Pharisees feared spiritual contamination; Jesus changed lives by his presence - is this a fair analysis of this passage?

3. What is the place for ‘great feasts’ and other forms of hospitality in our own communities? What do they say about community, social groups, ‘tribes’ and building relationships? Discuss modes of social gatherings and hospitality in your own contexts.

4. Levi offered hospitality that his friends and associates might meet Christ. Jesus accepted an invitation to a social event that anyone with religious or social sensitivities would have avoided. How might these two examples inform our understanding of mission and evangelism?

5. The challenge regarding fasting and praying was in large measure a question of spiritual and religious expression. Jesus responded in terms of timing (his presence was like a wedding celebration period), but also questioned whether the way of the Pharisees and their traditional modes of expressing their faith was compatible with the newfound freedoms and depth of change that Jesus represented. Does this speak at all to some of the social and cultural gaps that may exist between church communities and our wider (and increasingly non-Christian) society?

Other resources

An introduction to the Pharisees can be found on YouTube under ‘Why Study the Pharisees with Professor Roland Deines’

A study that both explores hospitality around the table in the New Testament and its significance for mission is by John Koenig, Soul Banquets: How Meals Become Mission in the Local Congregation. Harrisburg, NY; Morehouse Publishing, 2007

A thoughtful sermon on this passage by William Taylor (St Helen’s Bishopsgate in London) is available online at http://vimeo.com/52854191

Action points

Reflect on the place of the meal table in your own homes – how does it feature in daily routines? Is it the focal point for occasional or regular gatherings (family, neighbours, friends, acquaintances)? How might meeting around the ‘table’ (in whatever form it takes) be a way of introducing people to others, to deepen friendships and learn more of people’s stories, interests and passions in life?

Hospitality isn’t just something to be offered (on our terms, from our space): it is also something to be accepted. How might we ‘step out’ into our neighbourhoods and wider community by accepting offers to drop around or invitations that allow us to enter other people’s social space?

How might the two points above be reflected in our communal life as churches, not so much as program shaped mission and evangelism, but as creating space for more organic and relational approaches?

An Australian theologian was once asked for his advice on most effective approaches to mission and evangelism. He replied (tongue only half in cheek!) that the church might wipe its programs for a year, and concentrate on offering and accepting invitations to BBQ’s and family picnics and otherwise just hang out with people… are there elements of truth to this we need to weigh and consider?

Going deeper

Consider the place of festivals and meals in differing cultures and religions. Many cultural anthropologists have noted how powerful an expression of society and beliefs may be discerned through meal customs and rituals.

A Google search for ‘mary douglas meals’ will bring up a number of links with studies and resources in this area. (Mary Douglas was an esteemed British cultural anthropologist who pioneered studies in this area – see especially her ‘Deciphering a meal’ available online at:

http://etnologija.etnoinfolab.org/dokumenti/82/2/2009/douglas_1520.pdf

0 notes &

Jesus at the Table - Lenten Studies with a mission & evangelism focus

[NOTE: This is a CORRECTED version]]

This post starts an exercise in interactive Lenten Studies on the theme: Jesus at the Table.

The Introduction and six studies that follow will also be available as a pdf download through the link below.

Print version of Introduction

Comments, suggestions and feedback are welcome, and the later studies might include changes as a result of feedback. In any event, I welcome comments that may benefit other readers and participants in the studies.

Background information (from the Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels) on table fellowship may be found here.

 Jesus at the table 

INTRODUCTION

Overview

Lent 1             

Luke 5:27-39                          Levi’s great feast    

Lent 2             

Luke 7:36-50                          Simon the Pharisee & the woman of the streets

Lent 3             

Luke 14:1,7-11, 12-24                        Dinner party stories

Lent 4             

Luke 15: 1-2,11-32                 Celebration in heaven

Lent 5             

Luke 19:1-10                          Jesus chooses his own company

Holy Week     

Luke 22:14-28; 24:13-35        Last Supper… and a new beginning

 

A window into profound gospel truths

In our day and age of fast food and eating TV dinners we all too often overlook the significance of the meal table. Yet even in our world, the social realities of being either kept at a distance or invited and included in some elite function are not uncommon experiences. Whatever the culture the meal table reflects many of the key values affirmed by that culture. In the Western world, especially in cities, speed and convenience are key values. Yet even here strong reactions and alternatives in the form of cooking and dining as a major social event, not to mention nightly entertainment, is saying something about our society more generally.

In other cultures, such as the subcontinent, Asia, South America, Africa and much of Europe, eating is often a public event, or at least a profoundly communal one. This was certainly true in biblical times, and once you start looking for it you can see how often the meal table features not only as a backdrop but a major expression of the kingdom of God and the very down to earth enactment of the gospel itself.

These studies will explore the way in which Jesus made powerful statements about the gospel and the kingdom of God in and through the meal table. In the Gospel of Luke there are a range of references to the meal table. In some cases, they are to actual dinner parties to which Jesus was invited - and they came from both ends of the social spectrum: highly respectable religious leaders, through to those widely recognised as socially scandalous and undesirable company.

Elsewhere Jesus picks up the imagery of the prophets, where a great banquet becomes a powerful image of the fullness of the blessings promised by God. In this way, invitations to the greatest party of all are nothing less than an invitation into the people of God, an invitation extended only in the mercy and grace of God, and at the cost of the cross of Jesus. Such an invitation changes everything, and as Jesus shared at the table with an amazingly diverse bunch of people, we see lives changed both personally, and the gathering of God’s people that will share all the blessings promised at the time of Abraham.

A valuable context for mission and evangelism

It is no accident that approaches such as the popular Alpha Course have found gathering around a meal to be a significant and very meaningful context to explore questions of life. This is a rediscovery of one of the most productive forms of early mission and evangelism as we see in the book of Acts - volume two of Luke’s work that follows on from the Gospel.

As the church has been seeking to find common ground to invite and to meet with our wider community, hospitality and the meal table has rightly regained a central role as we seek to not only speak about the gospel but also to live it out.

Suggestions for the use of these Lenten Studies.

As these studies explore the social reality and theological significance of the meal table, it would be highly appropriate if at all possible for the studies to meet around an actual meal table in some form. Whether they be full meals that can be provided in an appropriate way, or at least a light supper (or even breakfast!), this will add an experience of what we are exploring alongside our investigation of Scripture and discussion of the themes and truths revealed in the Gospel of Luke.

To assist this, I will include some very early prayers and remembrances that took place around the table from earliest times, and through this we will gain a sense that our company around the table goes back many centuries, and extends throughout the world and across cultures.

Finally, it is my hope that as we rediscover afresh the gospel power of the table, so may the place of hospitality and participation in the ultimate meal be revitalised and given renewed expression in our life and outreach through our homes and churches.

Background.

In the world of the New Testament the meal table was a mini reflection of the community in which it was located. Someone’s place at a meal (or not) was very carefully located both through the invitation itself, and even the seating (or reclining) arrangements. Everyone had their place, whether it was as a guest, a host, someone watching on, or the many servants. In very real ways the table was at the heart of the home. While public space in the larger homes was provided for business or meeting with clients, behind closed doors and accessible only to those invited in was the more private space, and especially the table (tables were actually arranged in a ‘U’ shape, and those at table would recline, leaning on one side with feet pointing outwards).

Meals were an event. We can see something of this in the social rituals of the great country estates in previous centuries, re-enacted now though a TV series like ‘Downton Abbey’. Even in less elite contexts, meals made a statement about community, family, and welcome guests. When it came to the great festivals, the sharing in communal meals was a feature of celebrations. But for those in society who were more vulnerable, an invitation to a meal was one of life’s necessities. Even permission to eat the scraps and crumbs made a statement about those regarded as literally the lower levels of society, those who experienced the realities of social humiliation and exclusion.

Meals as a social event in the Graeco-Roman and Jewish worlds also followed well-recognised patterns, starting with invitations and responses. Guests would be welcomed and washed upon arrival; they would be shown to their seating (reclining) position, and introduced to the other guests; key elements of that household’s religious beliefs and observances would be conducted; the main meal would be served through a series of courses; upon the conclusion of the main meal itself, the party would re-form with a view to the ‘symposium’ – the drinks party that was the highlight of the evening. For some (many…), this involved the women of the house withdrawing and courtesan women being brought in to socialise and entertain (especially Graeco-Roman parties, but also in some sectors of Jewish society). For others the drinks stage was less about entertainment and more focused on discussion about how to live well, politics and philosophy. This often included attention to a special guest, and took the form of dialogue either privately or as a group.

Ultimately, meals as an event were all about social relationships, and especially formal recognition as a ‘friend’. Indeed, the party was essentially all about friendship-making. There was a strong sense of identification, where gathering around the table reflected shared values and commitments, and reflected obligations and loyalties that went well beyond the meal event. The honour of one became reflected honour to all; the shame or scandal of one became a shame upon all.

More detail about the social significance of meals and particular customs will be added at various points in the studies to follow.

Further reading

For further background information on the significance of ancient meal tables, see the article on ‘Table Fellowship’ in the Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels (attached).

John Koenig, Soul Banquets: How Meals Become Mission in the Local Congregation. Harrisburg, NY; Morehouse Publishing, 2007

Douglas Webster, Table Grace: The Role of Hospitality in the Christian Life. Fearn, Ross-shire: Christian Focus, 2011.

For more detailed studies, you might consult Jerome H. Neyrey, “Ceremonies in Luke-Acts: The Case of Meals and Table-Fellowship”. Pages 361-87 in The Social World of Luke-Acts. Edited by J. H. Neyrey. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1991.

 

Notes for Leaders

These Lenten studies are not designed to be heavy on content, but are shaped more in terms of providing a framework in which the focus and discussion can be flexible and go in directions of interest to the group.

I am especially keen that the aural and narrative qualities of the text speak for themselves. I have used the New Living Translation because it is fresh and reflects the sense of each passage in accessible terms, but groups are of course entirely free to use whatever translation(s) are preferred. Note, however, that the passages should be read aloud each week, and where possible those who have a gift for reading aloud should be encouraged to prepare a reading in advance. This may even be work-shopped with someone else who may comment on the emphasis or parts that could be read differently.

The goal in reading aloud should be to bring out qualities as if Luke was in in the room himself and narrating the events he records – for the reader to represent the author.

Some other resources will be noted as well – these are just suggestions and feel at liberty to add your own or just use what is of value in your own context.

 

 

Bishop Tim Harris